Notify Me of Each Issue:


Russell Miller

Advisory Board:

Gregor Bachmann
Nina Boeger
Matthias Casper
Helge Dedek
Hans-Michael Heinig
Florian Hoffmann
Alexandra Kemmerer
Frank Schorkopf

Senior Editors: 

Besty Baker
Jurgen Bast
Gralf-Peter Calliess

Patrycja Dabrowska
Elisa Hoven
Jen Hendry
Malcolm MacLaren
Stefan Magen
Ralf Michaels
Christoph Safferling
Emanuel Towfigh
Floris de Witte

Associate Editors:

Anna Katharina von Oettingen 

System-Building in Investment Treaty Arbitration and Lawmaking

By Stephan W. Schill
Read this Contribution as a PDF

Suggested Citation: Stephan W. Schill, System-Building in Investment Treaty Arbitration and Lawmaking, 12 German Law Journal 1083-1110 (2011), available at

A.  Introduction

Since the late 1990s investment treaty arbitration has developed into one of the most vibrant fields of international dispute settlement with now almost 400 known cases.   It involves claims by foreign investors against host States for breach of obligations assumed under one of the more than 2700 bilateral investment treaties (BITs), under the numerous investment chapters in bilateral or regional free trade agreements,  including the North American Free Trade Agreement,  or under sectoral treaties such as the Energy Charter Treaty.   All of these instruments offer comprehensive protection to foreign investors by setting down principles of substantive investment protection, including national and most-favored-nation treatment, fair and equitable treatment, full protection and security, protection against expropriation without compensation, and free capital transfer.   They also allow investors to enforce these standards in arbitral proceedings directly against the host State, most commonly under the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (ICSID Convention).   Investment treaty arbitration thereby not only empowers foreign investors under international law, but also introduces investment treaty tribunals as novel actors into the arena of international investment law.  Although arbitration has been a classic form of dispute settlement on the State-to-State level, including for the settlement of investment-related disputes,  modern investment treaty tribunals have wider jurisdiction and are more removed from State control than any of their predecessors.